4.8 Article

Creation of bladder assembloids mimicking tissue regeneration and cancer

Journal

NATURE
Volume 588, Issue 7839, Pages 664-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-3034-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1A2B5B01001490, NRF-2017M3C7A104787521, NRF-2017R1A5A101536614, NRF-2014M3C9A3064548]
  2. Gyeongbuk Science and Technology Promotion Center of Korea [SF317001A]
  3. POSCO [2018Y060]
  4. BK21 Plus
  5. BK21 FOUR Research Fellowship
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [4120200313623] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current organoid models are limited by their inability to mimic mature organ architecture and associated tissue microenvironments(1,2). Here we create multilayer bladder 'assembloids' by reconstituting tissue stem cells with stromal components to represent an organized architecture with an epithelium surrounding stroma and an outer muscle layer. These assembloids exhibit characteristics of mature adult bladders in cell composition and gene expression at the single-cell transcriptome level, and recapitulate in vivo tissue dynamics of regenerative responses to injury. We also develop malignant counterpart tumour assembloids to recapitulate the in vivo pathophysiological features of urothelial carcinoma. Using the genetically manipulated tumour-assembloid platform, we identify tumoural FOXA1, induced by stromal bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), as a master pioneer factor that drives enhancer reprogramming for the determination of tumour phenotype, suggesting the importance of the FOXA1-BMP-hedgehog signalling feedback axis between tumour and stroma in the control of tumour plasticity. Multilayer 3D reconstitution of bladder stem cells with stromal cells enables recapitulation of the architecture and molecular functions of bladder tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available