4.6 Article

Neutrophil activation by nanomaterials in vitro: comparing strengths and limitations of primary human cells with those of an immortalized (HL-60) cell line

Journal

NANOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 1-20

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2020.1834635

Keywords

Neutrophil; nanomaterial; inflammation; in vitro; nanotoxicology

Funding

  1. UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research [NC3Rs] [NC/P001149/1]
  2. EPSRC [1813003] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. NERC [NE/L007371/1, NE/H013172/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared responses to different nanomaterials between HL-60 cell line and primary neutrophils, finding a similar pattern of response. Some nanomaterials can stimulate neutrophil activation, but some functions may be compromised in HL-60 cells.
Assessment of nanomaterial (NM) induced inflammatory responses has largely relied on rodent testing via measurement of leukocyte accumulation in target organs. Despite observations that NMs activate neutrophil driven inflammatory responses in vivo, a limited number of studies have investigated neutrophil responses to NMs in vitro. We compared responses between the human neutrophil-like HL-60 cell line and human primary neutrophils following exposure to silver (Ag), zinc oxide (ZnO), copper oxide (CuO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) NMs. NM cytotoxicity and neutrophil activation were assessed by measuring cellular metabolic activity, cytokine production, respiratory burst, and release of neutrophil extracellular traps. We observed a similar pattern of response between HL-60 cells and primary neutrophils, however we report that some neutrophil functions are compromised in the cell line. Ag NMs were consistently observed to stimulate neutrophil activation, with CuO NMs inducing similar though weaker responses. TiO2 NMs did not induce a neutrophil response in either cell type. Interestingly, ZnO NMs readily induced activation of HL-60 cells but did not appear to activate primary cells. Our findings are relevant to the development of a tiered testing strategy for NM hazard assessment which promotes the use of non-rodent models. Whilst we acknowledge that HL-60 cells may not be a perfect substitute for primary cells and require further investigation regarding their ability to predict neutrophil activation, we recommend their use for initial screening of NM-induced inflammation. Primary human neutrophils can then be used for more focused assessments of neutrophil activation before progressing to in vivo models where necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available