4.6 Article

Colorimetric and turn-on fluorescence determination of mercury (II) by using carbon dots and gold nanoparticles

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abd977

Keywords

carbon dots; mercury ion; gold nanoparticles; turn-on fluorescence; colorimetric

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21305097]
  2. Two-Way Support Programs of Sichuan Agricultural University [00770113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A colorimetric and turn-on fluorometric assay with high sensitivity and selectivity for detecting mercury (II) ions was developed. The method involves the use of carbon dots with -SH and gold nanoparticles, and was successfully applied for determination of Hg2+ in real water samples.
A colorimetric and turn-on fluorometric assay with high sensitivity and selectivity is described for the optical detection of mercury (II) ions (Hg2+), based on carbon dots with -SH (SN-CDs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). On addition of Hg2+, the color of the system (SN-CDs/AuNPs) changes from red to blue. A new absorption peak appears at 700 nm, and its absorbance increases with the concentration of Hg2+, while at 530 nm, the absorbance of AuNPs decreases. Taking the ratio of absorbance at 700 and 530 nm as a signal, a colorimetric method with linear detection range of 0.5-4.0 mu M was established for the determination of Hg2+. Meanwhile, citrate ions on the surface of AuNPs can reduce Hg2+ to Hg-0, and through the strong affinity of Hg-0 and gold, gold-mercury alloys were formed to occupy the surface of AuNPs, so that the SN-CDs were re-free and the fluorescence of SN-CDs was restored. Consequently, a fluorometric method was founded in the linear detection range from 0.5 to 15.0 mu M of mercury (II). This dual-mode (colorimetric and turn-on fluorometric) method was applied successfully for determination of Hg2+ in real water samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available