4.8 Article

Structure-oriented catalytic radiosensitization for cancer radiotherapy

Journal

NANO TODAY
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100988

Keywords

Radiosensitization; Nanoparticle; Catalysis; Hydroxyl radical

Funding

  1. National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists [51725202]
  2. Key Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [19JC1412000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472794, 51872094]
  4. National Science Foundation for the Young Scientists of China [51702211, 21805090]
  5. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0107900]
  6. Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Equipment for Biological Diagnosis and Therapy in Universities of Shandong

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given that the outcome of clinical radiotherapy (RT) is closely related to the radiolysis products from the interactions between the radiation and intracellular water, an appropriate catalyst to promote radiolysis may improve the therapeutic efficacy. However, catalysis-based radiosensitization strategy remains under investigated. Herein, we propose a catalytic RT concept and synthesize Janus-like Au-Fe2C nanoparticles (AFCNPs) as the catalytic radiosensitizer to improve the conversion efficiency of free radicals from the water molecules, resulting in a nearly five-fold increase in hydroxyl radicals ((OH)-O-center dot) with comparison to pure Au nanoparticles under the clinical radiation dose. The theoretical simulation reveals that the catalytic activity of AFCNPs derived from the increase in the electron concentration on the surface of Au, as a result of the electron transfer from the Fe2C moiety with lower work function to the Au moiety with higher work function. As a novel radiosensitization strategy, catalytic RT has shown promising potentials warranting further exploration. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available