4.8 Article

Unusual Spectral Diffusion of Single CuInS2 Quantum Dots Sheds Light on the Mechanism of Radiative Decay

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 658-665

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04239

Keywords

Quantum dots; single-quantum-dot spectroscopy; CuInS2; spectral diffusion

Funding

  1. Netherlands Center for Multiscale Catalytic Energy Conversion (MCEC), NWO Gravitation Programme - Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science of the government of The Netherlands
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [14614]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NWO (VENI Grant) [722.017.002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The luminescence of CuInS2 quantum dots differs from many other types, with single core-only and core/shell CuInS2/CdS QDs exhibiting unique photophysical properties. These differences reflect the dipole moment of CuInS2's excited state and the preferred site of hole localization within the QD.
The luminescence of CuInS2 quantum dots (QDs) is slower and spectrally broader than that of many other types of QDs. The origin of this anomalous behavior is still under debate. Single-QD experiments could help settle this debate, but studies by different groups have yielded conflicting results. Her; we study the photophysics of single core-only CuInS2 and core/shell CuInS2/CdS QDs. Both types of single QDs exhibit broad PL spectra with fluctuating peak position and single-exponential photoluminescence decay with a slow but fluctuating lifetime. Spectral diffusion of CuInS2-based QDs is qualitatively and quantitatively different from CdSe-based QDs. The differences reflect the dipole moment of the CuInS2 excited state and hole localization on a preferred site in the QD. Our results unravel the highly dynamic photophysics of CuInS2 QDs and highlight the power of the analysis of single-QD property fluctuations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available