4.6 Article

Phenology based classification index method for land cover mapping from hyperspectral imagery

Journal

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 80, Issue 9, Pages 14321-14342

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-10484-6

Keywords

Phenology; Remote sensing; Hyperspectral image classification; Supervised classification

Funding

  1. RUSA - phase 2.0 grant, Policy (TNMulti-Gen), Dept. of Edn. Govt. of India [F.24-51/2014-U]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remote sensing imagery classification plays a role in providing assistance for comfort and societal security. The use of multispectral high-resolution imagery provides detailed information about the Earth's surface, while phenology reflection varies based on land cover type.
Remote sensing imagery classification contributes assistance to real-time applications for comfort and secures the society. The imagery of satellites entirely depends on the sensor type in satellites. Phenology reflection varies based on the land cover type, which absorbs external energy. Multispectral high-resolution imagery has the maximum details about the earth's surface. This research work defines phenology based classification approach, which can produce precise high precision land cover classification. The need to develop a phenology based methodology reflects on the vegetation development classification and produces a much more suitable land cover map based on reflection values. The RGB channel values of the image do not influence this technique of reflection phenology classification. Phenology Based Classification Index (PBCI) supervised method is used to classify the high-resolution multispectral imagery with improved phenology classification methods. PBCI works on the passive sensor satellite images, without clouds and shadow in classification. The proposed method has compared with existing phenology classification methods using more than seven quality metrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available