4.6 Article

Energetics of graphene origami and their spatial resolution

Journal

MRS BULLETIN
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 481-486

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/s43577-020-00018-8

Keywords

Nanostructure; C; Elastic properties; Aid architecture

Funding

  1. US Department of Defense: Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-17-1-0262]
  2. Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures [MCMS-E-0420K01]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [OCI-1053575, TG-DMR100029]
  4. NSF [CNS-1338099]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene's extreme thinness and high tensile strength make it an ideal material for discussing complex origami or cut-kirigami artwork. Computational analysis can quantify different energy contributions and establish a length scale where single or double folds become feasible.
The extreme thinness of graphene combined with its tensile strength made it a material appealing for discussing and even making complex cut-kirigami or folded-only origami. In the case of origami, its stability is mainly defined by the positive energy of the single- or double-fold curvature deformation counterbalanced by the energy reduction due to favorable van der Waals contacts. These opposite sign contributions also have notably different scaling with the size L of the construction, the contacts contributing in proportion to area similar to L-2, single folds as similar to L, and highly strained double-fold corners as only similar to L-0 = const. Computational analysis with realistic atomistic-elastic representation of graphene allows one to quantify these energy contributions and to establish the length scale, where a single fold is favored (7 nm < L < 21 nm) or a double fold becomes sustainable (L > 21 nm), defining the size of the smallest possible complex origami designs as L >> 21 nm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available