4.7 Article

The Ursa Major association of galaxies - VI: a relative dearth of gas-rich dwarf galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 501, Issue 2, Pages 2608-2626

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3582

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: individual: Ursa Major; galaxies: dwarf

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union [291531]
  2. Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO) through VICI grant [016.130.338]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study determined the HI mass function of galaxies in the Ursa Major association using VLA and WSRT surveys, revealing a relative lack of low-HI mass galaxies in the region. The slope of the HI mass function in Ursa Major hints at an environmental dependence, which differs from other surveys covering larger volumes and cosmic environments.
We determined the HI mass function of galaxies in the Ursa Major association of galaxies using a blind Very Large Array (VLA) D-array survey, consisting of 54 pointings in a cross-pattern, covering the centre as well as the outskirts of the Ursa Major volume. The calculated HI mass function has best-fitting Schechter parameters theta* = 0.19 +/- 0.11 Mpc(-3), log M-HI/M-circle dot* = 9.8 +/- 0.8, and alpha = -0.92 +/- 0.16. The high-mass end is determined by a complementary, targeted Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) survey, and the low-mass end is determined by the blind VLA survey. The slope is significantly shallower than the slopes of the HI Parkes All Sky Survey (alpha= -1.37 +/- 0.03 +/- 0.05) and Arecibo Legacy Fast Arecibo L-band Feed Array (alpha = -1.33 +/- 0.02) HI mass functions, which are measured over much larger volumes and cover a wider range of cosmic environments: There is a relative lack of low-H I mass galaxies in the Ursa Major region. This difference in the slope strongly hints at an environmental dependence of the HI mass function slope.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available