4.7 Article

Cosmological constraints from higher redshift gamma-ray burst, HII starburst galaxy, and quasar (and other) data

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 501, Issue 1, Pages 1520-1538

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3748

Keywords

cosmological parameters; dark energy; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-SC0011840]
  2. NSF [CNS-1006860, EPS-1006860, EPS-0919443, ACI-1440548, CHE-1726332]
  3. NIH [P20GM113109]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0011840] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study utilizes various cosmological constraints from different observational data sets, confirming mutual consistency. The results suggest that the universe is undergoing accelerating expansion, with dark energy potentially acting as a cosmological constant and spatial hypersurfaces likely being flat.
We use higher redshift gamma-ray burst (GRB), HII starburst galaxy (H IIG), and quasar angular size (QSO-AS) measurements to constrain six spatially flat and non-flat cosmological models. These three sets of cosmological constraints are mutually consistent. Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of these data sets are largely consistent with currently accelerating cosmological expansion and with cosmological constraints derived from a combined analysis of Hubble parameter (H(z)) and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO, with Planck-determined baryonic matter density) measurements. A joint analysis of the H(z) + BAO + QSO-AS + HIIG + GRB data provides fairly model-independent determinations of the non-relativistic matter density parameter Omega(m0) = 0.313 +/- 0.013 and the Hubble constant H-0 = 69.3 +/- 1.2 kms(-1) Mpc(-1). These data are consistent with the dark energy being a cosmological constant and with spatial hypersurfaces being flat, but they do not rule out mild dark energy dynamics or a little spatial curvature. We also investigate the effect of including quasar flux measurements in the mix and find no novel conclusions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available