4.7 Article

The clustering of DESI-like luminous red galaxies using photometric redshifts

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 501, Issue 3, Pages 3309-3331

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3764

Keywords

galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: haloes; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0007914]
  2. Office of Science, Office ofHigh Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH1123]
  3. Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology Center through the Samuel P. Langley PITT PACC Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship - Space Telescope Science Institute [HST-HF2-51441.001]
  5. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  6. NSF [AST-0808133, AST-0807630, AST-0806732, AST-1616414]
  7. DOE [DE-SC0020086]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0019022]
  9. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST 1516266, AST 1517563]
  10. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-SC0015628]
  11. Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH1123]
  12. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility
  13. U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Astronomical Sciences [AST-0950945]
  14. Science and Technologies Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  15. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  16. Heising-Simons Foundation
  17. French Alternative Energies and Atomic EnergyCommission (CEA)
  18. National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico
  19. DESI Member Institutions
  20. Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECaLS) [2014B-0404]
  21. U.S. Department of Energy
  22. U.S. National Science Foundation
  23. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  24. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  25. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  26. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
  27. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  28. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  29. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  30. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo
  31. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  32. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  33. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  34. Collaborating Institutions in the Dark Energy Survey
  35. University of California at Santa Cruz
  36. University of Cambridge, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  37. DES-Brazil Consortium
  38. University of Edinburgh
  39. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  40. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  41. University of Nottingham
  42. Ohio State University
  43. University of Portsmouth
  44. Texas AM University
  45. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  46. Chinese Academy of Sciences (the Strategic Priority Research Program 'The Emergence of Cosmological Structures') [XDB09000000]
  47. Special Fund for Astronomy from the Ministry of Finance
  48. External Cooperation Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [114A11KYSB20160057]
  49. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11433005]
  50. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  51. NASA LTSA grant [NNG04GC89G]
  52. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  53. Department ofEnergy, theNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
  54. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  55. Max Planck Society
  56. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah - STFC (UK)
  57. ARC (Australia)
  58. AAO
  59. ESO Very Large Telescope, under the 'Large Programme' [182.A-0886]
  60. Beijing-Arizona Sky Survey (BASS) [2015A-0801]
  61. Mayall z-band Legacy Survey (MzLS) [2016A-0453]
  62. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  63. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  64. Argonne National Laboratory
  65. University of Chicago
  66. University College London
  67. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  68. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  69. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  70. University of Michigan
  71. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  72. University of Pennsylvania
  73. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  74. Stanford University
  75. University of Sussex
  76. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0015628, DE-SC0020086] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents measurements of redshift-dependent clustering of a luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample selected from the Legacy Survey imaging data set, and fits the clustering signal using the halo occupation distribution (HOD) framework. The HOD parameters are found to show little evolution except at the highest redshifts. New photometric redshift estimates and a new algorithm for dividing irregular survey geometries are developed, as well as a technique for finding best-fitting parameters in Markov chain Monte Carlo fitting. The study also releases a catalog of accurate photometric redshifts for objects with z < 21 over more than 16,000 deg(2) of sky.
We present measurements of the redshift-dependent clustering of a DESI-like luminous red galaxy (LRG) sample selected from the Legacy Survey imaging data set, and use the halo occupation distribution (HOD) framework to fit the clustering signal. The photometric LRG sample in this study contains 2.7 million objects over the redshift range of 0.4 < z < 0.9 over 5655 deg(2). We have developed new photometric redshift (photo-z) estimates using the Legacy Survey DECam and WISE photometry, with sigma(NMAD) = 0.02 precision for LRGs. We compute the projected correlation function using new methods that maximize signal-to-noise ratio while incorporating redshift uncertainties. We present a novel algorithm for dividing irregular survey geometries into equal-area patches for jackknife resampling. For a five-parameter HOD model fit using the MultiDark halo catalogue, we find that there is little evolution in HOD parameters except at the highest redshifts. The inferred large-scale structure bias is largely consistent with constant clustering amplitude over time. In an appendix, we explore limitations of Markov chain Monte Carlo fitting using stochastic likelihood estimates resulting from applying HOD methods to N-body catalogues, and present a new technique for finding best-fitting parameters in this situation. Accompanying this paper, we have released the Photometric Redshifts for the Legacy Surveys catalogue of photo-z's obtained by applying the methods used in this work to the full Legacy Survey Data Release 8 data set. This catalogue provides accurate photometric redshifts for objects with z < 21 over more than 16 000 deg(2) of sky.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available