4.6 Article

Investigation of Parameters Influencing Tubular-Shaped Chitosan-Hydroxyapatite Layer Electrodeposition

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26010104

Keywords

chitosan; electrodeposition; kinetics; implant; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. National Centre for Research and Development, Poland [LIDER/18/0116/L-10/18/NCBR/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the electrodeposition process from chitosan-hydroxyapatite colloidal solutions under different voltages, monitoring parameters such as total charge exchanged, gas volume, and deposit thickness over time. The study reveals that voltage influences structural characteristics but not deposit thickness, suggesting a mechanism of deposit formation involving interactions between hydroxide ions, calcium ions, and chitosan chains.
Tubular-shaped layer electrodeposition from chitosan-hydroxyapatite colloidal solutions has found application in the field of regeneration or replacement of cylindrical tissues and organs, especially peripheral nerve tissue regeneration. Nevertheless, the quantitative and qualitative characterisation of this phenomenon has not been described. In this work, the colloidal systems are subjected to the action of an electric current initiated at different voltages. Parameters of the electrodeposition process (i.e., total charge exchanged, gas volume, and deposit thickness) are monitored over time. Deposit structures are investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The value of voltage influences structural characteristics but not thickness of deposit for the process lasting at least 20 min. The calculated number of exchanged electrons for studied conditions suggests that the mechanism of deposit formation is governed not only by water electrolysis but also interactions between formed hydroxide ions and calcium ions coordinated by chitosan chains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available