4.7 Article

Clinical Perspective: Treating RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 442-463

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.11.029

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics (CAROT)
  2. Robert and Susan Heidenberg Investigative Research Fund for Ocular Gene Therapy
  3. Pennsylvania Lions Sight Conservation and Research Foundation
  4. Hope For Vision
  5. Paul and Evanina Bell Mackall Foundation Trust
  6. Research to Prevent Blindness
  7. Brenda and Matthew Shapiro Stewardship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Luxturna, the first FDA-approved gene therapy product for a genetic disease, has reversed blindness in individuals with retinal degenerative disease. It has not only transformed the lives of many previously destined to live a life of blindness, but also sparked interest in developing gene therapy treatments for other inherited retinal diseases.
Until recently, there was no approved treatment for a retinal degenerative disease. Subretinal injection of a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) delivering the normal copy of the human RPE65 cDNA led to reversal of blindness first in animal models and then in humans. This led to the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gene therapy product for a genetic disease, voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna). Luxturna was then approved by the European Medicines Association and is now available in the US through Spark Therapeutics and worldwide through Novartis. Not only has treatment with Luxturna changed the lives of people previously destined to live a life of blindness, but it has fueled interest in developing additional gene therapy reagents targeting numerous other genetic forms of inherited retinal disease. This review describes many of the considerations for administration of Luxturna and describes how lessons from experience with Luxturna could lead to additional gene-based treatments of blindness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available