4.7 Review

Orphan Crops and their Wild Relatives in the Genomic Era

Journal

MOLECULAR PLANT
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 27-39

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.12.013

Keywords

orphan crop; wild relative; weed; genome; crop diversity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971865]
  2. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [LZ17C130001]
  3. Innovation Method Project of China [2018IM0301002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article provides an overview of genomic studies on orphan crops, focusing on orphan cereals and their wild relatives. Genomes of at least 12 orphan cereals and/or their wild relatives have been sequenced, with potential for genetic improvement in both orphan and major crops in the genomic era.
More than half of the calories consumed by humans are provided by three major cereal crops (rice, maize, and wheat). Orphan crops are usually well adapted to low-input agricultural conditions, and they not only play vital roles in local areas but can also contribute to food and nutritional needs worldwide. Interestingly, many wild relatives of orphan crops are important weeds of major crops. Although orphan crops and their wild relatives have received little attentions from researchers for many years, genomic studies have recently been performed on these plants. Here, we provide an overview of genomic studies on orphan crops, with a focus on orphan cereals and their wild relatives. The genomes of at least 12 orphan cereals and/or their wild relatives have been sequenced. In addition to genomic benefits for orphan crop breeding, we discuss the potential ways for mutual utilization of genomic data from major crops, orphan crops, and their wild relatives (including weeds) and provide perspectives on genetic improvement of both orphan and major crops (including de novo domestication of orphan crops) in the coming genomic era.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available