4.4 Article

Impact of PET/MRI in the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Journal

MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 456-466

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-020-01569-7

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer; PET/MRI; MRI; PET; FDG; Management changes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated that PET/MRI significantly altered the management of PDAC, consistently leading to clinical management changes across different SCI modalities. This suggests a potential role for PET/MRI in the management of PDAC.
Purpose: Imaging is central to the diagnosis and management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study evaluated if positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) elicited treatment modifications in PDAC when compared to standard of care imaging (SCI). Procedures: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose ([F-18]F-FDG) PET/MRI and SCI from May 2017 to January 2019. SCI included abdominal computed tomography (CT), MRI, and/or PET/CT. For patients who had more than one pair of PET/MRI and SCI, each management decision was independently evaluated. Treatment strategies based on each modality were extracted from electronic medical records. Follow-up was evaluated until January 2020. Results: Twenty-five patients underwent 37 PET/MRI's, mean age was 65 +/- 9 years and 13 (13/25, 52 %) were men. 49 % (18/37, 95 % CI 33-64 %) of the PET/MRI scans changed clinical management. Whether the SCI included a PET/CT or not did not significantly modify the probability of management change (OR = 0.9, 95 % CI 0.2-4, p = 1). One hundred percent (33/33) of the available follow-up data confirmed PET/MRI findings. Conclusions: PET/MRI significantly changed PDAC management, consistently across the different SCI modalities it was compared to. These findings suggest a role for PET/MRI in the management of PDAC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available