4.7 Letter

ITGBL1 is a new immunomodulator that favors development of melanoma tumors by inhibiting natural killer cells cytotoxicity

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12943-020-01306-2

Keywords

Melanoma; ITGBL1; MITF

Funding

  1. Societe Francaise de Dermatologie
  2. INCA [INCa_10573]
  3. ARC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resistance to immunotherapies in melanoma patients is associated with a decrease in cell differentiation and an increase in the mesenchymal phenotype. The loss of MITF plays a role in melanoma cells evading the immune system, with ITGBL1 identified as a key immunomodulator. Inhibiting ITGBL1 could potentially improve melanoma response to immunotherapies.
Resistances to immunotherapies remains a major hurdle towards a cure for melanoma in numerous patients. An increase in the mesenchymal phenotype and a loss of differentiation have been clearly associated with resistance to targeted therapies. Similar phenotypes have been more recently also linked to resistance to immune checkpoint therapies. We demonstrated here that the loss of MIcrophthalmia associated Transcription Factor (MITF), a pivotal player in melanocyte differentiation, favors the escape of melanoma cells from the immune system. We identified Integrin beta-like protein 1 (ITGBL1), a secreted protein, upregulated in anti-PD1 resistant patients and in MITFlow melanoma cells, as the key immunomodulator. ITGBL1 inhibited immune cell cytotoxicity against melanoma cells by inhibiting NK cells cytotoxicity and counteracting beneficial effects of anti-PD1 treatment, both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, MITF inhibited RUNX2, an activator of ITGBL1 transcription. Interestingly, VitaminD3, an inhibitor of RUNX2, improved melanoma cells to death by immune cells. In conclusion, our data suggest that inhibition of ITGBL1 might improve melanoma response to immunotherapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available