4.7 Article

Analysis of porous structures of cellulose aerogel monoliths and microparticles

Journal

MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS
Volume 310, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110625

Keywords

Aerogels; Cellulose; Drug release; Mesoporous materials; Microparticles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigates the porous structures of cellulose aerogel monoliths and microparticles, and evaluates the potential of cellulose aerogel microparticles in drug delivery. The aerogels exhibit high porosity, significant mesopores, and a high specific surface area. The porous architecture of the microparticles leads to a slower drug release compared to direct loading into aqueous medium.
In this work, the porous structures of cellulose aerogel monoliths and microparticles are analyzed and the po-tential of cellulose aerogel microparticles in drug delivery is assessed. Cellulose dissolved in ionic liquid and N,Ndimethylformamide mixed solvents are regenerated into gels using antisolvent ethanol. The gels are then supercritically dried in carbon dioxide to obtain aerogels. Gel monoliths are cast inside a mold, while the gel microparticles of mean diameter 23-54 mu m are obtained by emulsifying cellulose solutions in a surfactant stabilized oil-in-oil emulsion system followed by regeneration in ethanol. Cellulose crystallinity, porosity and pore architecture, bulk density, and specific surface area of aerogel monoliths and microparticles are determined. In conjunction, the effects of water ingress on changes of pore architectures are assessed. These aerogel specimens show porosity as high as 99%, significant mesopores, and high specific surface area of 358 +/- 13 m(2)/g and 426 +/- 12 m(2yyy)/g respectively for monoliths and microparticles. The porous architecture of the microparticles is responsible for slower release of the drug than when directly loaded into aqueous medium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available