4.7 Article

Simultaneous determination of curcuminoids in Curcumae Longae Rhizoma and turmeric tea using liquid-phase microextraction based on solidification of floating deep eutectic solvent drop

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105341

Keywords

Deep eutectic solvent; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Curcumae Longae Rhizoma; Turmeric tea; High performance liquid chromatography; Solidification of floating organic droplet

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81973287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple and efficient liquid-phase microextraction procedure has been developed based on solidification of floating deep eutectic solvent (DES) drop for simultaneous separation and preconcentration of active curcuminoids in Curcumae Longae Rhizoma and turmeric tea. In this work, a hydrophobic and low-density DES prepared from tetrabutylammonium chloride and decanoic acid as extractant was injected into the sample phase, and a cloudy solution was formed by magnetic stirring at 40 degrees C. After extraction, the floating and reaggregated DES drop was recovered through solidification for high performance liquid chromatography analysis. The important extraction variables were optimized including extraction solvent type and consumption, sample phase pH, salt amount, stirring rate, extraction time and temperature. Under the optimal conditions, good responses were presented with detection limits of 7.0 x 10(-5), 7.0 x 10(-5), 9.0 x 10(-5) mg/L, and enrichment factors of 608, 621, and 848 for bisdemethoxycurcumin, demethoxycurcumin and curcumin, respectively. Satisfactory accuracies (recoveries 84.6-116.8%) and precisions (relative standard deviations 1.4-4.2%) were also obtained. The proposed method was successfully applied for extraction and determination of three curcuminoids in real herbal and dietary supplement samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available