4.5 Article

Synchronous gallbladder metastasis of renal cell carcinoma presenting as a gallbladder polyp A case report

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024037

Keywords

gallbladder polyp; metastasis; renal cell carcinoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gallbladder metastasis of RCC is rare but should be managed cautiously, especially when dealing with polyp changes in patients. Changes in gallbladder polyps in RCC patients should raise suspicions and prompt intervention may lead to better outcomes.
Rationale: Gallbladder polyps are common in the general population, but gallbladder metastasis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is very rare. In a patient with RCC diagnosed with a small gallbladder polyp that does not meet the traditional size criteria, the surgeon faces a dilemma of whether cholecystectomy should be performed given the possibility of metastasis. Patient concerns: A 55-year-old man who had received a left nephrectomy for RCC presented with a gallbladder polyp that was noted at the time of the nephrectomy. Imaging showed the maximum diameter of the polyp had increased from 5 mm to 24 mm in the 40 months after the initial diagnosis. Diagnosis: Pathological and immunohistology findings confirmed the gallbladder polyp as a metastasis of clear-cell RCC. Interventions : We performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Outcomes: Even though the synchronous solitary gallbladder metastasis was left untreated and a cholecystectomy was not performed over the 40 months, no metastasis occurred in other sites. The patient is free from disease 10 months after the cholecystectomy. Lessons: Solitary gallbladder metastasis of RCC may have more favorable outcomes than typical metastases. Although gallbladder metastasis of RCC occur rarely, it can occur, and any changes in gallbladder polyps in RCC patients should be managed under a strong suspicion of metastasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available