4.2 Review

Can the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Be Used to Determine Gastric Cancer Treatment Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

DISEASE MARKERS
Volume 2016, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2016/7862469

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81201888, 81372549, 81172370]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20122104110009]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2014029201]
  4. Program of Education Department of Liaoning Province [L2014307]
  5. Project for Construction of Major Discipline Platform in Universities of Liaoning Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prognostic role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in gastric cancer remains controversial. We aimed to quantify the prognostic role of peripheral blood NLR in gastric cancer. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The results for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS) are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 19 studies with 5431 patients were eligible for final analysis. Elevated NLRs were associated with a significantly poor outcome for OS (HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.75-2.24, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.32-1.88, p < 0.001) compared with patients who had normal NLRs. The NLR was higher for patients with late-stage compared with early-stage gastric cancer (OR = 2.76; 95% CI: 1.36-5.61, p = 0.005). NLR lost its predictive role for patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received palliative surgery (HR = 1.73; 95% CI: 0.85-3.54, p = 0.13). Our results also indicated that prognoses might be influenced by the NLR cutoff values. In conclusion, elevated pretreatment NLRs are associated with poor outcome for patients with gastric cancer. The ability to use the NLR to evaluate the status of patients may be used in the future for personalized cancer care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available