Journal
MEDICAL CARE
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 13-21Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001458
Keywords
pharmaceuticals; medication nonadherence; affordability; Medicare Part D; survey methods
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- National Institute on Aging [R01AG028745, R01AG022362, R21AG060401]
- Northeastern University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examines the current national prevalence of cost-related nonadherence (CRN) and risk factors in the US Medicare population. It found that low-income, sicker individuals are more likely to experience CRN, highlighting the consequences of high cost-sharing for prescription fills in Medicare.
Background: Unaffordability of medications is a barrier to effective treatment. Cost-related nonadherence (CRN) is a crucial, widely used measure of medications access. Objectives: Our study examines the current national prevalence of and risk factors for CRN (eg, not filling, skipping or reducing doses) and companion measures in the US Medicare population. Research Design: Survey-weighted analyses included logistic regression and trends 2006-2016. Subjects: Main analyses used the 2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Our study sample of 12,625 represented 56 million community-dwelling beneficiaries. Measures: Additional outcome measures were spending less on other necessities in order to pay for medicines and use of drug cost reduction strategies such as requesting generics. Results: In 2016, 34.5% of enrollees under 65 years with disability and 14.4% of those 65 years and older did not take their medications as prescribed due to high costs; 19.4% and 4.7%, respectively, experienced going without other essentials to pay for medicines. Near-poor older beneficiaries with incomes $15-25K had 50% higher odds of CRN (vs. >$50K), but beneficiaries with incomes <$15K, more likely to be eligible for the Part D Low-Income Subsidy, did not have significantly higher risk. Three indicators of worse health (general health status, functional limits, and count of conditions) were all independently associated with higher risk of CRN. Conclusions: Changes in the risk profile for CRN since Part D reflect the effectiveness of targeted policies. The persistent prevalence of CRN and associated risks for sicker people in Medicare demonstrate the consequences of high cost-sharing for prescription fills.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available