4.7 Article

Effect of solidified grain boundary on interfacial creep failure behavior for steel/nickel dissimilar metal welded joint

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.140482

Keywords

Solidified grain boundary; Dissimilar metal welded joint; Interfacial failure; Creep cavities; Macrosegregation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675336]
  2. SJTU Global Strategic Partnership Fund [2019-2021 SJTU-OU]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interfacial creep failure of steel/nickel dissimilar metal welded joints is strongly influenced by solidified grain boundaries, especially short boundaries that tend to form cavities, while long boundaries show fewer cavities. Controlling the presence of short boundaries and macrosegregation can improve the creep life of these joints.
Interfacial creep failure was strongly affected by the solidified grain boundary (SGB) for steel/nickel dissimilar metal welded joints, especially at higher temperatures and lower stresses. Short, long, and mixed length SGBs were found as three distinct characteristics adjacent to the interface. These characteristics were attributed to the heterogeneous nucleation, multi-layer thermal cycle, and pre-solidified macrosegregation inducing local cooling rate differences, respectively. Because of the diffusion of elements C and N across the interface, short SGBs were more likely to be occupied completely by coarsening granular carbides (M23C6 and M6C) and acicular nitrides (AlN and TiN), which promoted the relative sliding of SGBs. This resulted in a large number of cavities at the interface with short SGBs, while few cavities were observed for long SGBs. Besides, the shorter side of mixed length SGBs also tended to form cavities in macrosegregation. These findings indicated that controlling the presence of short SGBs and macrosegregation could improve the creep life of the dissimilar metal welded joints.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available