4.6 Article

First-principles-assisted band gap predictions of methylammonium metal formates

Journal

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111239

Keywords

Metal-organic frameworks; Band gaps; Density functional theory

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT: Ministry of Science and ICT) [2020R1F1A1066029]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1F1A1066029] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically examined the band gaps of several metal-organic frameworks and calculated their stabilities, revealing that the band gap of methylammonium barium formate was the highest while that of methylammonium copper formate was the lowest. Additionally, the effects of charge transfer and pressure on the band gaps of methylammonium nickel formate were explored.
Identifying metal-organic frameworks that are applicable in the visible light area is significant. In this study, the band gaps of six different systems of methylammonium metal formates ([CH3NH3][M(HCOO)(3)] (M = Ni, Cu, Zn, Ge, Sn, and Ba)) were examined systematically. The formation energies of hypothetically designed systems of methylammonium germanium formate ([CH3NH3][Ge(HCOO)(3)]), methylammonium tin formate ([CH3NH3][Sn (HCOO)(3)]), and methylammonium barium formate ([CH3NH3][Ba(HCOO)(3)]) were calculated to investigate their stability. Among the compounds, methylammonium barium formate ([CH3NH3][Ba(HCOO)(3)]) and methylammonium copper formate ([CH3NH3][Cu(HCOO)(3)]) possessed the highest and lowest band gap, respectively. In addition, the effects of charge transfer and pressure on the band gaps of methylammonium nickel formate ([CH3NH3][Ni(HCOO)(3)]) were explored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available