4.4 Article

Assessment of cathodic protection effect on long-distance gas transportation pipelines based on buried steel specimens

Journal

MATERIALS AND CORROSION-WERKSTOFFE UND KORROSION
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 839-858

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/maco.202012020

Keywords

buried steel specimen; cathodic protection; corrosion rate; long‐ distance natural gas pipeline; quantitative assessment

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M653481]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674212]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the effectiveness of CP system and determines the causes of external corrosion of pipelines by analyzing damaged points of anticorrosive coatings, buried steel specimens, and soil samples. Control measures for external corrosion of pipelines are proposed based on the findings.
Different severe corrosions are found at the damaged point of anticorrosive coating on natural gas pipelines, even though the cathodic protection (CP) potential is between -0.85 and -1.15 V. Therefore, there are totally 168 buried steel specimens (BSSs) and 28 soil samples at 28 buried points that are taken out in situ and then analyzed in the lab to assess the CP effectiveness. First, the CP status is simulated by BSSs at the damaged points, and the corrosion products on BSSs are analyzed microscopically. Second, the corrosion rates of the testing BSSs are calculated by the weight-loss method to perform the quantitative assessment. Third, the specific reasons for external corrosion are explored via analyzing the CP potential attenuation tendency and the corrosiveness of soil. The corrosion growth trend is also investigated by comparing the test results among three test cycles within 8 years. Finally, the control measures for external corrosion of pipelines are put forward. The study is beneficial to evaluate the CP system and determine the causes of external corrosion of pipelines, thereby formulating corresponding protective measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available