4.5 Review

Evaluating and minimizing batch effects in metabolomics

Journal

MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 421-442

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mas.21672

Keywords

batch effect; mass spectrometry; metabolome analysis; metabolomics; NMR

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs
  3. Genome Canada
  4. Alberta Innovates
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining metabolomic differences among samples of different phenotypes is crucial, but the presence of batch effects can affect the accuracy of the results. This review discusses the origins of batch effects, methods to detect interbatch variations, and approaches to correct unwanted data variability. The reduction of batch effects is an active and challenging research area.
Determining metabolomic differences among samples of different phenotypes is a critical component of metabolomics research. With the rapid advances in analytical tools such as ultrahigh-resolution chromatography and mass spectrometry, an increasing number of metabolites can now be profiled with high quantification accuracy. The increased detectability and accuracy raise the level of stringiness required to reduce or control any experimental artifacts that can interfere with the measurement of phenotype-related metabolome changes. One of the artifacts is the batch effect that can be caused by multiple sources. In this review, we discuss the origins of batch effects, approaches to detect interbatch variations, and methods to correct unwanted data variability due to batch effects. We recognize that minimizing batch effects is currently an active research area, yet a very challenging task from both experimental and data processing perspectives. Thus, we try to be critical in describing the performance of a reported method with the hope of stimulating further studies for improving existing methods or developing new methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available