Journal
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages 2696-2708Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28624
Keywords
artifacts; diffusion MRI; distortion correction; EPI; reproducibility
Funding
- NIH
- NIBIB Intramural Program
- NINDS Intramural Program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that an acquisition design with four PEDs, including all DWIs in addition to b =0 s/mm(2) images, achieved the highest reproducibility in diffusion MRI studies. Protocols that used only b = 0 s/mm(2) for distortion correction had the lowest reproducibility.
Purpose: To assess the effects of blip-up and -down echo planar imaging (EPI) acquisition designs, with different choices of phase-encoding directions (PEDs) on the reproducibility of diffusion MRI (dMRI)-derived metrics in the human brain. Methods: Diffusion MRI data in seven subjects were acquired five times, each with five different protocols. The base design included 64 diffusion directions acquired with anterior-posterior (AP) PED, the first and second protocols added reverse phase-encoded b=0 s/mm(2) posterior-anterior (PA) PED images. The third one included 32 directions all with PED acquisitions with opposite polarity (AP and PA). The fourth protocol, also with 32 unique directions used four PEDs (AP, PA, right-left (RL), and left-right (LR)). The scan time was virtually identical for all protocols. The variability of diffusion MRI metrics for each subject and each protocol was computed across the different sessions. Results: The highest reproducibility for all dMRI metrics was obtained with protocol four (AP/PA-RL/LR, ie, four-way PED). Protocols that used only b = 0 s/mm(2) for distortion correction, which are the most widely used designs, had the lowest reproducibility. Conclusions: An acquisition design with four PEDs, including all DWIs in addition to b =0 s/mm(2) images should be used to achieve high reproducibility in diffusion MRI studies.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available