4.5 Article

Synthetic Simulator for Surgical Training in Tracheostomy and Open Airway Surgery

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 131, Issue 7, Pages E2378-E2386

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29359

Keywords

Simulator; simulation; tracheotomy; tracheostomy; airway; open; laryngotracheoplasty; laryngotracheal reconstruction; cricoid split; graft; pediatric; children; adult; adolescent; Awsim

Funding

  1. Gnat and Bastable-Potts Chair in Otolaryngology
  2. Hospital for Sick Children Restracomp Scholarship
  3. Choi family
  4. Lo family
  5. Stronach family
  6. Paris family

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A synthetic simulator was developed and validated for teaching tracheostomy and laryngotracheal reconstruction procedures, with high face and content validity demonstrated. The simulator was found to be comparable to using a live porcine model for these surgical procedures.
Objective(s) To create and validate a synthetic simulator for teaching tracheostomy and laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) using anterior costal cartilage and thyroid ala cartilage grafts. Methods A late adolescent/adult neck and airway simulator was constructed based on CT scans from a cadaver and a live patient. Images were segmented to create three-dimensional printed molds from which anatomical parts were casted. To evaluate the simulator, expert otolaryngologists - head and neck surgeons performed tracheostomy and LTR using anterior costal cartilage and thyroid ala cartilage grafts on a live anesthetized porcine model (gold standard) followed by the synthetic simulator. They evaluated each model for face validity (realism and anatomical accuracy) and content validity (perceived effectiveness as a training tool) using a five-point Likert scale. For each expert, differences for each item on each simulator were compared using Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests with Sidak correction. Results Nine expert faculty surgeons completed the study. Experts rated face and content validity of the synthetic simulator an overall median of 4 and 5, respectively. There was no difference in scores between the synthetic model and the live porcine model for any of the steps of any of the surgical procedures. Conclusion The synthetic simulator created for this study has high face and content validity for tracheostomy and LTR with anterior costal cartilage and thyroid ala cartilage grafts and was not found to be different than the live porcine model for these procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available