4.7 Article

Associations of Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicity, and Education With 13 Epigenetic Clocks in a Nationally Representative US Sample: The Health and Retirement Study

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab016

Keywords

DNA methylation; DunedinPoAm38; Epigenetic age; GrimAge; PhenoAgeAcceleration

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [U01 AG009740]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the associations between 13 epigenetic clocks and their links to social, demographic, and behavioral factors known to be related to health outcomes. Second generation clocks trained on health-related characteristics tend to have stronger relationships with sociodemographic and health behaviors associated with health outcomes in older adults.
Background: Many DNA methylation-based indicators have been developed as summary measures of epigenetic aging. We examine the associations between 13 epigenetic clocks, including 4 second generation clocks, as well as the links of the clocks to social, demographic, and behavioral factors known to be related to health outcomes: sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, obesity, and lifetime smoking pack-years. Methods: The Health and Retirement Study is the data source which is a nationally representative sample of Americans over age 50. Assessment of DNA methylation was based on the EPIC chip and epigenetic clocks were developed based on existing literature. Results: The clocks vary in the strength of their relationships with age, with each other and with independent variables. Second generation clocks trained on health-related characteristics tend to relate more strongly to the sociodemographic and health behaviors known to be associated with health outcomes in this age group. Conclusions: Users of this publicly available data set should be aware that epigenetic clocks vary in their relationships to age and to variables known to be related to the process of health change with age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available