Journal
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 271-282Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21978
Keywords
Alaska; demographic modeling; horn size; mountain goat; non‐ invasive sampling; Oreamnos americanus; population genetics
Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) undergraduate student research award
- Ontario Graduate Scholarship
- NSERC Discovery Grant, Canada Foundation for Innovation John R. Evans Leaders Fund
- Compute Canada
- Alaska Department of Fish and Game through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program [AKW-19-P6.0]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Obtaining field data and analytical methods for wildlife population conservation and management are significant challenges, especially for species in difficult-to-reach landscapes or small, isolated populations. Integrating genetic and non-genetic data can enhance understanding of population dynamics. Studying a low-density mountain goat population, genetic and morphologic data indicated demographically isolated peninsular subpopulations and influenced sustainable harvest quotas. The importance of using genetic and morphologic data, along with demographic modeling, in delineating population boundaries and dynamics for small, isolated populations was highlighted.
Acquisition of field data and analytical methods needed for conservation and management of wildlife populations represent significant challenges, particularly for species that inhabit landscapes that are difficult to access or species that persist in small, isolated populations. In such instances, integrating diverse and complementary data streams, such as genetic and non-genetic data, can advance our understanding of population dynamics and associated management implications. We examined how genetic and morphologic data can be used to articulate population structure of a low-density, peninsular population of mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) on the Cleveland Peninsula, Alaska, USA, and surrounding areas, 2005-2018. We then use a population demographic modeling approach to examine how the use of population structure information influences sustainable harvest quotas, as compared to a panmictic, null model. Specifically, we conducted extensive field sampling of genetic (n = 446) and morphologic (i.e., horn length, n = 371) data to characterize population structure. We conducted demographic analyses and examined harvest modeling scenarios using a sex- and age-specific matrix population modeling approach. Genetic and morphologic data analyses suggested peninsular subpopulations were demographically isolated, relative to surrounding mainland populations. Specifically, genetic structuring was evident and followed an isolation-by-distance, stepping-stone pattern indicating limited interchange, low effective population sizes, and reduced genetic diversity along a peninsular extremity to mainland gradient. Harvest modeling indicated that overharvest would likely occur if the panmictic, null model was used to guide harvest because the smallest genetically defined population at the peninsular extremity was too small to permit any level of sustainable harvest. Our analyses illustrate the importance of using genetic and morphologic data, in combination with demographic modeling, to quantitatively delineate population boundaries and dynamics for ensuring viability of small, isolated populations. (c) 2020 The Wildlife Society.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available