4.1 Article

The effect of different drinking water in culture medium on feces microbiota diversity

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 267-277

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wh.2020.075

Keywords

16S rRNA; drinking water; gut microbiota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that different types of drinking water have an impact on the gut microbiota of mice, with mineral water as a culture medium potentially contributing to the progressive increase in gut microbiota diversity, particularly dominated by the Bacteroidetes taxa.
The human gut harbors trillions of microbes, which are extremely important to the health of the host. However, the effect of drinking water on gut microbiota has been poorly understood. In this study, we explored the response of BALB/c mice gut bacterial community (feces) to the different types of drinking water, including commercial bottled mineral water (MW), natural water (NW), purified water (PW) and tap water (TW). Feces were cultured with brain heart infusion broth dissolved in four types of drinking water. 16S rRNA gene analysis was performed. Our results reveal that the microbiota composition is different among culturing with four types of drinking water. As the culture time increases, the number of OTUs significantly decreased, except under the aerobic condition of MW. Under aerobic conditions on the 5th day, the considerable differences of alpha diversity index are found between MW and three others, and these are the most unique taxa in the MW group. Importantly, the LEfSe analysis discovers that the Bacteroidetes taxa dominate the differences between MW and the other water types. Our findings demonstrate that the mineral water as a culture medium may lead to a progressive increase of the gut microbiota diversity by providing the growth convenience to Bacteroidetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available