4.7 Article

Optimization of hybrid nanoparticles with mixture fluid flow in an octagonal porous medium by effect of radiation and magnetic field

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages 1413-1424

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-10376-9

Keywords

Hybrid nanoparticle; Octagonal porous enclosure; Natural convection; Magnetic field; RSM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the hydrothermal behavior of a hybrid nanofluid with MoS2-TiO2 hybrid nanoparticles in a cavity enclosure, showing that an increase in Rayleigh number from 10 to 100 led to a 61.82% improvement in average Nusselt number. Results indicate that the Rayleigh number has the most significant contribution to the achieved equation, accounting for approximately 61.88%.
Investigation of fluid behavior in a cavity enclosure has been a significant issue from the past in the field of fluid mechanics. In the present study, hydrothermal evaluation of hybrid nanofluid with a water-ethylene glycol (50-50%) as the base fluid which contains MoS2-TiO2 hybrid nanoparticles, in an octagon with an elliptical cavity in the middle of it, has been performed. In this problem, the effects of the radiation parameter, porosity, and the magnetic parameter have been analyzed on temperature distribution and fluid flow streamlines and also, on the local and average Nusselt numbers. The governing equations have been solved by the finite element method (FEM). As a novelty, the Taguchi method has been utilized for test design. Further, the response surface method (RSM) has been applied to achieving the optimum value of the involved parameters. The obtained results illustrate that with an augment in the Rayleigh number from 10 to 100, the average Nusselt number will improve by about 61.82%. Additionally, regarding the correlation, it is indeed transparent that the Rayleigh number has the most colossal contribution comparing other factors on the achieved equation, by about 61.88%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available