4.7 Article

DLP 3D printing of scandia-stabilized zirconia ceramics

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 684-690

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.010

Keywords

3D printing; Ceramics; Rheology; Stereolithography; Zirconia

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation [14.625.21.0040, RFMEFI62516 x 0040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article aims to explore the printability of scandia-stabilized zirconia ceramic parts using desktop and low-cost DLP 3D printer. Homogeneous slurries with appropriate rheological and UV-curing properties were prepared with scandia-stabilized zirconia powders. The ceramics showed promising Vickers microhardness and high ionic conductivity, demonstrating the potential of DLP as a method for fabricating scandia-stabilized zirconia parts for SOFC applications.
The present article aims to explore the printability of scandia-stabilized zirconia ceramic parts using desktop and low-cost DLP 3D printer. The acrylate-based homogeneous slurries with zirconia powder stabilized by 6 mol.% of Sc2O3 (6ScSZ) and 10 mol.% of Sc2O3 and 1 mol.% of Y2O3 (10Sc1YSZ) were prepared with appropriate rheological and UV-curing properties. In comparison with yttria-stabilized zirconia, slurries filled with 6ScSZ and 10Sc1YSZ powders reviled lower viscosity at the same solid content. The cure depth of the suspensions was suitable to print the objects with 50 mu m of layer thickness, good interlayers connection, and surface finishing. No critical defects in ceramics such as cracks or delamination were observed. Both ceramics have the Vickers microhardness value of 11 GPa and the high ionic conductivity up to 0.2 S/m at 900 degrees C demonstrating that the DLP is a promising method of fabricating scandia-stabilized zirconia parts as electrolyte material for SOFC application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available