4.4 Article

Treatment of pain following cancer: applying neuro-immunology in rehabilitation practice

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 714-721

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1261418

Keywords

Pain; neuropathic; sensitization; exercise; education; sleep

Categories

Funding

  1. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) with an Early Career Research Grant
  2. Berekuyl Academy / European College for Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy, the Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Pain is the second most frequent persistent symptom following cancer treatment. This article aims at explaining how the implementation of contemporary pain neuroscience can benefit rehabilitation for adults following cancer treatment within an evidence-based perspective. Materials and methods: Narrative review. Results: First, pain education is an effective but underused strategy for treating cancer related pain. Second, our neuro-immunological understanding of how stress can influence pain highlights the importance of integrating stress management into the rehabilitation approach for patients having cancer-related pain. The latter is supported by studies that have examined the effectiveness of various stress management programmes in this population. Third, poor sleep is common and linked to pain in patients following cancer treatment. Sleep deprivation results in a low-grade inflammatory response and consequent increased sensitivity to pain. Cognitive behavioural therapy for sleep difficulties, stress management and exercise therapy improves sleep in patients following cancer treatment. Finally, exercise therapy is effective for decreasing pain in patients following cancer treatment, and may even decrease pain-related side effects of hormone treatments commonly used in cancer survivors. Conclusions: Neuro-immunology has increased our understanding of pain and can benefit conservative pain treatment for adults following cancer treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available