Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 117, Issue 539, Pages 1452-1465Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1863221
Keywords
Potential outcomes; Randomization; Statistical decision theory
Categories
Funding
- UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K503150/1, EP/J018317/1]
- EPSRC [EP/J018317/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In game theory and statistical decision theory, random decision strategies often outperform deterministic strategies in minimizing expected loss. Novel and flexible random design strategies are shown to have better properties than deterministic counterparts in linear model estimation and prediction, with stronger bounds on the loss distribution. The use of random strategies in experimental design selection can lead to finite bounds on expected loss, compared to existing deterministic designs where expected loss is unbounded.
In game theory and statistical decision theory, a random (i.e., mixed) decision strategy often outperforms a deterministic strategy in minimax expected loss. As experimental design can be viewed as a game pitting the Statistician against Nature, the use of a random strategy to choose a design will often be beneficial. However, the topic of minimax-efficient random strategies for design selection is mostly unexplored, with consideration limited to Fisherian randomization of the allocation of a predetermined set of treatments to experimental units. Here, for the first time, novel and more flexible random design strategies are shown to have better properties than their deterministic counterparts in linear model estimation and prediction, including stronger bounds on both the expectation and survivor function of the loss distribution. Design strategies are considered for three important statistical problems: (i) parameter estimation in linear potential outcomes models, (ii) point prediction from a correct linear model, and (iii) global prediction from a linear model taking into account an L-2-class of possible model discrepancy functions. The new random design strategies proposed for (iii) give a finite bound on the expected loss, a dramatic improvement compared to existing deterministic exact designs for which the expected loss is unbounded. for this article are available online.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available