4.6 Review

Stochastic Gradient Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 116, Issue 533, Pages 433-450

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1847120

Keywords

Bayesian inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Scalable Monte Carlo; Stochastic gradients

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/S00159X/1, EP/R01860X/1, Bayes4Health EP/R018561/1, CoSInES EP/R034710/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/R018561/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/R01860X/1, EP/R018561/1, EP/S00159X/1, EP/R034710/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MCMC algorithms are considered the gold standard technique for Bayesian inference, but the computational cost can be prohibitive for large datasets, leading to the development of scalable Monte Carlo algorithms. One type of these algorithms is SGMCMC, which reduces per-iteration cost by utilizing data subsampling techniques.
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms are generally regarded as the gold standard technique for Bayesian inference. They are theoretically well-understood and conceptually simple to apply in practice. The drawback of MCMC is that performing exact inference generally requires all of the data to be processed at each iteration of the algorithm. For large datasets, the computational cost of MCMC can be prohibitive, which has led to recent developments in scalable Monte Carlo algorithms that have a significantly lower computational cost than standard MCMC. In this article, we focus on a particular class of scalable Monte Carlo algorithms, stochastic gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo (SGMCMC) which utilizes data subsampling techniques to reduce the per-iteration cost of MCMC. We provide an introduction to some popular SGMCMC algorithms and review the supporting theoretical results, as well as comparing the efficiency of SGMCMC algorithms against MCMC on benchmark examples. The supporting R code is available online at .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available