4.7 Article

Stopping Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced CKD and Risk of Adverse Outcomes: A Nationwide Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 424-435

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020050682

Keywords

ACE inhibitors; mortality risk; dialysis; cardiovascular events; kidney disease; renin-angiotensin system

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2019-01059]
  2. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation [20190587]
  3. Westman Charitable Foundation
  4. Karolinska University Hospital
  5. Stockholm City Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that stopping RAS inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced CKD was associated with higher risks of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events, but lower risk of initiating kidney replacement therapy (KRT).
Background It is unknown whether stopping renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced CKD affects outcomes. Methods We studied patients referred to nephrologist care, listed on the Swedish Renal Registry during 2007-2017, who developed advanced CKD (eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73m(2)) while on RAS inhibitor therapy. Using target trial emulation techniques on the basis of cloning, censoring, and weighting, we compared the risks of stopping within 6 months and remaining off treatment versus continuing RAS inhibitor therapy. These included risks of subsequent 5-year all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Results Of 10,254 prevalent RAS inhibitor users (median age 72 years, 36% female) with new-onset eGFR >30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), 1553 (15%) stopped RAS inhibitor therapy within 6 months. Median eGFR was 23 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Compared with continuing RAS inhibition, stopping this therapy was associated with a higher absolute 5-year risk of death (40.9% versus 54.5%) and major adverse cardiovascular events (47.6% versus 59.5%), but with a lower risk of KRT (36.1% versus 27.9%); these corresponded to absolute risk differences of 13.6 events per 100 patients, 11.9 events per 100 patients, and -8.3 events per 100 patients, respectively. Results were consistent whether patients stopped RAS inhibition at higher or lower eGFR, across prespecified subgroups, after adjustment and stratification for albuminuria and potassium, and when modeling RAS inhibition as a time-dependent exposure using a marginal structural model. Conclusions In this nationwide observational study of people with advanced CKD, stopping RAS inhibition was associated with higher absolute risks of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events, but also with a lower absolute risk of initiating KRT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available