Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1933-+Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.008
Keywords
Long-term care; implementation; mealtimes; relationship-centered care
Categories
Funding
- Alzheimer Society of Canada Doctoral Award
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Award
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study demonstrated the efficacy of a 12-month external facilitated implementation of CHOICE+ in improving mealtime environments in residential care facilities. Significant improvements were seen in the physical and social environments, relationship-centered care practices, and overall quality of the dining environment at all sites during the intervention period.
Objectives: Mealtimes in residential care tend to be task-focused rather than relationship-centered, impacting resident quality of life. CHOICE+ uses participatory approaches to make mealtimes more relationship-centered. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of the 12-month external facilitated implementation of CHOICE+ to improve the mealtime environment. Design: Modified stepped-wedge time series design. Setting and Participants: Dining rooms in 3 homes were entered into the intervention every 4 months; total study length was 20 months. Pre-and postintervention evaluations were attained from residents (n = 27, n = 19) and staff (n = 39, n = 29) respectively. Methods: Five meals in each home were observed by a blinded trained assessor every 4 months using the Mealtime Scan+ to assess physical, social, and relationship-centered practices and overall quality of the dining environment. Repeated measures analysis determined change in mealtime environment scores. The Team member Mealtime Experience Questionnaire and 5 questions from the InterRAI Quality of Life Questionnaire for residents and family were administered at pre-and postintervention. Results: There were significant increases in physical and social environments, relationship-centered care practices, and overall quality of the mealtime environment during the intervention period at all sites (all P <.001) and significant site by intervention interactions for physical (P =.01) and relationship-centered care (P = .03). Statistically significant site differences were noted for relationship-centered care practices (P <.001) and overall quality of the dining environment (P < .002). There was no significant difference in staff and resident/family pre-/postintervention questionnaire results. Conclusions and Implications: The external facilitated model of CHOICE+ resulted in significant improvements in the mealtime environment. Although site context impacted implementation, this study demonstrates that mealtimes can be improved even in homes that have challenges. Future work should determine impact of these improvements on other outcomes such as resident quality of life, using more specific measures. (c) 2020 AMDA d The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available