4.6 Article

Clinically Important Differences for Mobility Measures Derived from the Testosterone Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 517-523

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16942

Keywords

clinically important difference; mobility improvement; randomized controlled trials

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health [U01 AG030644]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
  3. National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke
  4. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  5. AbbVie
  6. Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center grant [5P30AG031679]
  7. National Institute on Aging [K07AG3587]
  8. Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center [P30-AG021342]
  9. CTSI [UL1TR000142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study determined the clinically important difference in walking ability measurements among older men with mobility limitations, finding that an increase of 16 to 30 meters in walking distance and 5 to 15 points in functional descriptors over 12 months may be clinically meaningful.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Accurate estimates of clinically important difference (CID) are required for interpreting the clinical importance of treatments to improve physical function, but CID estimates vary in different disease populations. We determined the CID for two common measures of walking ability in mobility-limited older men. Design Longitudinal, multisite placebo-controlled trial. Setting/Participants Men enrolled in the Testosterone Trials who had self-reported mobility limitation and gait speed less than 1.2 m/second (n = 429). Testosterone- and placebo-allocated participants were combined for this study. RESULTS Mean changes from baseline, adjusting for time-in-intervention and site, were 29.6, 13.2, 12.5, -2.4, and -32.6 m for 6MWD, and 15.4, 7.2, 2.1, -3.4, and -7.2 for PF10 in men who reported their mobility was very/much better, little better, no change, little worse, or much worse, respectively. CID estimates using regression, ROC, and eCDF varied from 5.0-29.6 m for 6MWD, and 5.0-15.2 points for PF10. CONCLUSION CID estimates vary by the population studied and by the method and precision of measurement. Increases of 16 to 30 m for 6MWD and 5 to 15 points for PF10 over 12 months appear to be clinically meaningful in mobility-limited, older hypogonadal men. These CID estimates may be useful in the design of efficacy trials of therapies to improve physical function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available