4.5 Article

Connectivity and network development of carbonate-hosted fault damage zones from western Malta

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104212

Keywords

Connectivity; Fault damage zone; Topology; Fracture network; Graph theory

Funding

  1. Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters [6257]
  2. Equinor [6257]
  3. Leverhulme Emeritus Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using outcrop-based examples, we investigate the topological and graph characteristics of various fault damage zones in carbonate rocks on Malta. The damage zone fracture networks are analysed as a series of nodes (isolated I-nodes; connected Y/X-nodes) and branches (II-, IC-, CC-branches), which may link to form connected components and fracture-bounded regions. We compare the metrics of the different nodes, branches, regions and components that make-up each damage zone fracture network, calculating parameters that assess their connectivity. Results identify distinct topological signatures and graph metrics for different tip-, relay- and splay-damage zones, providing a new classification that describes and quantifies their arrangement and connectivity. Placing the studied damage zones in a fault evolutionary model highlights topological pathways whereby tip-damage zones, dominated by I-nodes and II-branches, give way to relay-damage zones, dominated by Y-nodes and CC-branches. During this process, tree-like components link to form larger interconnected components with many regions. This systematically changes the graph metrics of the network increasing the number of branches and regions relative to nodes and components. The topological pathways and graph metrics provide important insights into how damages zones might develop as faults propagate, interact and link and could have implications when assessing their importance for fluid-flow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available