4.6 Review

Global levels of fundamental motor skills in children: A systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 39, Issue 7, Pages 717-753

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1841405

Keywords

motor development; motor skills; children; movement skills; physical activity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that children's fundamental motor skill levels increase with age, and boys demonstrate higher proficiency in object control skills compared to girls. Children's fundamental motor skill levels were below to average when compared to normative data.
Competence in fundamental motor skills (FMS) facilitates physical activity participation and is important for children's holistic development. This study aimed to systematically review the FMS levels of children worldwide, using the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2). In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, studies were identified from searches across 7 databases. Studies were required to: (i) include typically developing children (3-10 years), (ii) be published in English, (iii) have been published between 2004 and 2019 and, (iv) report >= 1 TGMD-2 outcome scores. Extracted data were evaluated based on importance of determinants, strength of evidence, and methodological quality. Data from 64 articles were included. Weighted mean (and standard deviation) scores were calculated for each FMS outcome score. Analyses revealed FMS competence increases across age during childhood, with greater proficiency in locomotor skills than object control skills. Additionally, boys exhibit higher object control skill proficiency than girls. Compared to TGMD-2 normative data, children demonstrate below average to average FMS levels. This review highlights the scope for FMS development among children worldwide. These findings reinforce the necessity for FMS interventions in early educational settings, as FMS competence is positively associated with physical activity and other health outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available