Rural Perceptions of Acute Care at Home: A Qualitative Analysis

Purpose: Hospital-level care at home in urban areas delivers low-cost, high-quality care. Few have attempted to deliver home hospital care in a rural environment, where traditional hospitals are often less equipped to deliver high-quality care. Little is known about rural clinicians' and patients' perceptions regarding rural home hospital care and how the urban model might be adapted to fit rural circumstances. Methods: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews in the United States with a national purposive sample of practicing rural clinicians, a focus group with clinicians who care for rural patients, and interviews with rural patients. We coded these qualitative data into domains and subdomains. Findings: We identified 4 domains: (1) current state of rural health care, (2) attitudes toward rural home hospital, (3) perceived barriers to implementing rural home hospital, and (4) perceived facilitators to implementing rural home hospital. Participants expressed challenges with current rural health care, including inefficient care coupled with poor access. Most felt rural home hospital care could offer benefits, including comfort, timeliness, and downstream outcomes such as readmission rate reduction. Rural patients were open to receiving acute care in their homes. Potential barriers included geographic accessibility, Internet connectivity, rural hospital politics, the culture of hospitalization, and the availability of skilled human resources. Conclusions: Significant interest and optimism exist surrounding rural home hospital despite perceived barriers. Designing for and testing adaptations to the urban model will likely optimize benefits and minimize threats to a potential intervention.

Automated summary

Research on rural home hospital care in the United States found that both rural clinicians and patients are generally supportive of the concept, recognizing potential benefits such as comfort and improved outcomes. However, barriers such as geographic accessibility, Internet connectivity, and hospital politics were mentioned as potential challenges to implementing such care in rural areas.