4.1 Article

Lessons being learned from the Covid-19 pandemic for radiological emergencies and vice versa: report from expert discussions

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abd841

Keywords

Covid-19 pandemic; Fukushima and Chernobyl accidents; emergency management; radiological risks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the lessons that radiological emergency management and the Covid-19 pandemic can offer each other. The discussions highlight the importance of considering the non-radiological and non-epidemiological consequences of emergencies, the need for multidisciplinary expertise in communication and emergency management, the value of stakeholder engagement, and the benefits of unified voices from policymakers and science agencies in building trust.
In order to examine what lessons radiological emergency management may offer for the management of the Covid-19 pandemic, and vice versa, a series of three online webinars were conducted with leading experts, scholars and practitioners from a wide range of disciplines essential for emergency management and long-term risk governance. The first webinar debated the lessons we are learning from the Covid-19 pandemic for radiological risk communication, the second explored issues around longer-term outcomes of a crisis and how to balance these with short-term actions whilst the third focused on the key challenges of the 'transition phase', using lessons learned from the Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima Daichii (2011) accidents. This paper reviews the discussions and provides valuable lessons for the radiation protection community. Results of the discussions indicated that: (a) non-radiological and non-epidemiological consequences of emergencies, for example psychological (mental health), societal and economic, should not be underestimated; (b) multidisciplinary expertise is imperative for communication efforts and for effective emergency management, including decision-making in the application of protective measures; (c) stakeholder engagement, including the involvement of the potentially affected population, should be encouraged from an early stage; and (d) trust is increased if policy-makers and the main science agencies show a unified voice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available