Journal
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY
Volume 74, Issue 7, Pages 1562-1571Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.11.028
Keywords
VCA; Facial transplant; Mucosa; Rejection; Vascularized composite allotransplantation
Categories
Funding
- DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)
- Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award) [UL 1TR002541]
- Harvard University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This retrospective study analyzed changes in oral and nasal mucous membranes of nine facial vascularized composite allotransplant patients. The study found that mucosal lesions were more common than previously reported, with ulcerations, edema, and erythema being the most common types. Sirolimus and skin Banff grade were identified as independent predictors of mucosal inflammation.
Background: Cutaneous changes of facial vascularized composite allotransplants (fVCAs) are extensively described in the literature. Parts of the nose, nasal, and oral cavities are included in most fVCAs. Distinctively, the nose and mouth are lined by mucosa. Little is known about the histopathology and complications of the mucosa involved in fVCA patients. Methods: The study constitutes a retrospective cohort study of nine fVCA patients. Medical records were reviewed for information about changes of oral and nasal mucous membranes. Types of mucosal lesions were recorded and analyzed. Uni- and multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to assess the odds of developing mucosal inflammation in the presence of clinico-pathologic variables. Results: A total of 186 clinical encounters with examination of oral and nasal mucous membranes were included. Membranes were devoid of clinical pathology in 101 instances (53% of all clinical assessments). Ulcerations/erosions (27%), edema (18%), and erythema (14%) were the most common lesions. Oral lesions affected the lips (58%), buccal mucosa (38%), and palate (5%). Sinonasal processes predominantly affected nasal vestibules and septae. In univariate analysis, sirolimus, skin rejection, and skin Banff grade were associated with the presence of an acute inflammatory mucosal lesion (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, skin Banff grade and sirolimus were independent predictors of mucosal inflammation. Conclusion: Pathologies of fVCA mucous membranes are more common than previously reported. Mucosal assessment plays an important role in the pleomorphic allograft rejection process evaluation rather than diagnosis and treatment based on cutaneous pathology. A closer look at the pathophysiology of fVCA mucosal rejection and inflammation is warranted. (C) 2020 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available