4.8 Article

Defect Origin of Emission in CsCu2I3 and Pressure-Induced Anomalous Enhancement

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 317-323

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03432

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91833302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study indicates that CsCu2I3 undergoes a structural phase transition under high pressure, and the behavior of optical band gap and photoluminescence peaks is anomalous, possibly due to the influence of intrinsic defects.
Lead-free metal halide perovskites CsCu2X3 (X = Cl, Br, I) with a high photoluminescence quantum yield are promising materials for optoelectronic devices. However, the origin of photoluminescence (PL) emission is still under debate, and the anomalous dependence of PL on pressure is unclear. Here, we systemically study the effects of high pressure on the structural, electronic, and optical properties of CsCu2I3 using a diamond anvil cell (DAC) and first-principles calculations. We argue that the ground state structure of CsCu2I3 belongs to the pnma phase rather than the cmcm phase under ambient conditions. There is a structural phase transition from the pnma to the cmcm phase for CsCu2I3 at similar to 5 GPa. The optical band gap derivative from absorption spectra increases from 3.57 to 3.62 eV within a pressure range of 0 to 4.03 GPa, and it then decreases over 4.03 GPa. There are two major PL emissions peaks at 2.11 and 2.32 eV, which are attributed to the intrinsic defect related trap states in CsCu2I3. Interestingly, there is an anomalous dependence of both PL emissions on pressure, such that PL peaks show a blueshift and the PL intensity is enhanced from 0 to similar to 4 GPa, with redshifting and decreasing at pressures above similar to 4 GPa. The anomalous evolution of the two PL emissions also suggests a defect origin of emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available