4.3 Article

The prospective evaluation and risk factors of dysphagia after surgery in patients with oral cancer

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40463-020-00479-6

Keywords

Prospective; Dysphagia; Quality of life; Oral carcinoma; Head and neck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the swallowing ability and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery, identifying risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Factors such as advanced T stage, bilateral neck dissection, and muscle resection were found to be associated with poor swallowing ability. Close attention should be paid to managing oral cancer patients with reconstructive surgery based on the identified risk factors.
Background: This prospective study investigated the change of swallowing ability using the Swallowing Ability Scale System (SASS) and swallowing-related quality of life (QOL) by Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer patients (PSS-H&N). This study also investigated the risk factors for postoperative dysphagia in patients who received reconstructive surgery for oral cancer. Subjects and Methods: This study included 64 patients (33 men and 31 women) who underwent radical surgery with neck dissection and reconstructive surgery for oral cancers between July 2014 and February 2018. We evaluated risk factors for poor swallowing ability after treatment, including demographic factors, preoperative factors and perioperative factors, with univariate and multivariate analyses. The change of swallowing ability by the SASS and swallowing-related QOL by PSS-H&N were evaluated prospectively prior to the initiation of surgery within 1 week and at 1 and 3 months after treatment. Results: Advanced T stage (T3, 4) (odds ratio (OR) = 79.71), bilateral neck dissection (OR = 20.66) and the resection of unilateral or bilateral suprahyoid muscles (OR = 17.00) were associated with poor swallowing ability after treatment. The scores for time for food intake and Eating in Public were associated with decrease of QOL in the poor group. Conclusions: We propose that clinicians consider the risk factors identified in this study and pay close attention to the management of oral cancer patients with reconstructive surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available