4.7 Article

Microstructural stability of ODS steel after very long-term creep test

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 547, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152833

Keywords

ODS; Creep test; Very long-term; TEM; XRD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microstructure of 9Cr oxide dispersion strengthened tempered martensitic steel (TMS) cladding and 12Cr-ODS ferritic steel cladding after very long-term internal pressurized creep tests was observed. The stability of martensite and ferrite matrix structure, including carbide distribution and nano-particle distribution, were investigated. Results confirmed that nano-particles were stably present during high-temperature and very long-term stress loading, contributing to preventing matrix structure degradation and excellent creep strength of the materials.
Microstructure of 9Cr oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) tempered martensitic steel (TMS) cladding and 12Cr-ODS ferritic steel cladding after very long-term internal pressurized creep tests was observed. The creep test conditions were 700 degrees C for 46,504 h and 750 degrees C for 45,550 h for 9Cr-ODS TMS and 700 degrees C for 30,116 h for 12Cr-ODS ferritic steel. The stability of martensite and ferrite matrix structure, including carbide distribution, dislocation density, and lath boundary, and that of nano-particle distribution were investigated. It was confirmed that the nano-particles were stably present during the high-temperature and very long-term stress loading environment, contributing to the prevention of matrix structure degradation. The results of observation are consistent with the fact that the 9Cr-ODS TMS and 12Cr-ODS ferritic steel exhibit excellent creep strength and show no reduction in the slope of the stress versus time to rupture curve over a significantly extended period of time in the creep test. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available