4.5 Article

Better modulation for risk decision-making after optimized magnetic stimulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 858-871

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24772

Keywords

decision‐ making; Game of Dice Task; intermittent theta burst stimulation; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; risk decision‐ making; Risk Gains Task

Categories

Funding

  1. National key research and development program of China [2016YFC1300604]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571149, 31970979, 81803103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that both iTBS and 20 Hz stimulation significantly improved negative feedback in risk decision-making tasks, increasing safe options and reducing risky options, while also increasing the utilization rate of positive feedback. Additionally, iTBS had a stronger risk reduction effect following negative feedback compared to 20 Hz stimulation.
Traditional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can only produce a significant but weak effect on the cortex while theta burst stimulation (TBS), a patterned accelerated form of stimulation, can produce a stronger poststimulation effect, which may improve decision-making abilities. We designed a comparative assessment of the effect of intermittent TBS (iTBS), 20 Hz, in two risk decision-making tasks on healthy controls. Participants were randomized and assigned to the iTBS (n = 29), 20 Hz (n = 29), or sham (n = 29) groups. The effects of the different methods of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation on risk decision-making functions were compared based on subjects' performance in the Game of Dice Task (GDT) and Risky Gains Task (RGT). The main indicators were positive and negative feedback utilization rates of GDT and RGT. Both iTBS and 20 Hz stimulation resulted in significant improvements upon negative feedback in the GDT, with increases in safe options and reductions in risky options; iTBS stimulation increased subjects' use of positive feedback in the GDT and RGT (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, the iTBS group had a stronger feedback risk reduction effect than the 20 Hz or sham group following RGT negative feedback (p < 0.05). Individuals would integrate positive and negative information more efficiently, leading to them making rational choices after excitatory transcranial magnetic stimulation. Moreover, iTBS has a stronger risk reduction effect following negative feedback than the 20Hz stimulation did. In summary, iTBS might have clinical value in decision promotion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available