Journal
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages 211-222Publisher
AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00340.2020
Keywords
explicit learning; implicit learning; locomotion; retention; stroke
Categories
Funding
- National Institutes of Health [1R01-HD-078330-01A, S10RR028114-01, F31NS111806]
- Foundation for Physical Therapy Research [2016 Florence P. Kendell Doctoral Scholarship]
- Foundation for Physical Therapy Research [2018-2019 Promotion for Doctoral Studies (PODS) Level I Award]
- Foundation for Physical Therapy Research [2019-2020 Promotion for Doctoral Studies (PODS) Level II Award]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Implicit and explicit processes can occur within a single locomotor learning task. Stroke survivors use both processes similarly to healthy adults during visually guided locomotion learning. The amount of explicit processes is related to how well stroke survivors retain the new walking pattern, but not to task performance. Understanding underlying learning mechanisms is important for retention of newly learned motor behavior.
Implicit and explicit processes can occur within a single locomotor learning task. The combination of these learning processes may impact how individuals acquire/retain the task. Because these learning processes rely on distinct neural pathways, neurological conditions may selectively impact the processes that occur, thus, impacting learning and retention. Thus, our purpose was to examine the contribution of implicit and explicit processes during a visually guided walking task and characterize the relationship between explicit processes and performance/retention in stroke survivors and age-matched healthy adults. Twenty chronic stroke survivors and twenty healthy adults participated in a 2-day treadmill study. Day 1 included baseline, acquisition1, catch, acquisition2, and immediate retention phases, and day 2 included 24-h retention. During acquisition phases, subjects learned to take a longer step with one leg through distorted visual feedback. During catch and retention phases, visual feedback was removed and subjects were instructed to walk normally (catch) or how they walked during the acquisition phases (retention). Change in step length from baseline to catch represented implicit processes. Change in step length from catch to the end of acquisition2 represented explicit processes. A mixed ANOVA found no difference in the type of learning between groups (P = 0.74). There was a significant relationship between explicit processes and 24-h retention in stroke survivors (r=0.47, P = 0.04) but not in healthy adults (r= 0.34, P = 0.15). These results suggest that stroke may not affect the underlying learning mechanisms used during locomotor learning, but that these mechanisms impact how well stroke survivors retain the new walking pattern. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study found that stroke survivors used implicit and explicit processes similar to age-matched healthy adults during a visually guided locomotion learning task. The amount of explicit processes was related to how well stroke survivors retained the new walking pattern but not to how well they performed during the task. This work illustrates the importance of understanding the underlying learning mechanisms to maximize retention of a newly learned motor behavior.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available