4.5 Article

Myenteric plexitis is a risk factor for endoscopic and clinical postoperative recurrence after ileocolonic resection in Crohn's disease

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 753-758

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.02.023

Keywords

Crohn's disease; Plexitis; Postoperative recurrence; Risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: As surgical resection is not curative in Crohn's disease, postoperative recurrence remains a crucial issue. The selection of patients, according to available risk factors, remains disappointing in clinical practice highlighting the need for better criteria, such as histologic features. Aims: To investigate whether submucosal and myenteric plexitis increase the risk of endoscopic, clinical and surgical postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. Methods: From the pathology department database, we retrospectively retrieved the data of all the patients who have undergone ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease. Two pathologists, blinded from clinical data, reviewed all specimens to evaluate the presence of plexitis at the proximal resection margin. Results: Of the 75 included CD patients, 19 (25.3%) had histological involvement of resection margin. Inflammatory cells count for myenteric and submucosal plexus were performed in 56 patients. In multivariate analysis, the myenteric plexitis was a risk factor for endoscopic postoperative recurrence (HR 8.83 CI95% [1.6-48.6], p = 0.012), and the presence of at least one myenteric lymphocyte (HR 4.02 CI95% [1.4-11.2], p = 0.008) was predictive of clinical postoperative recurrence. We observed no histologic predictor for surgical postoperative recurrence. Conclusion: Myenteric plexitis in proximal margins of ileocolonic resection specimens is independently associated with endoscopic and clinical postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease. (C) 2016 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available