4.5 Review

Association between physical activity and inflammatory bowel disease risk: A meta-analysis

Journal

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 1425-1431

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.08.129

Keywords

Crohn's disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; Meta-analysis; Physical activity; Ulcerative colitis

Funding

  1. Applied Basic Research Fund of Changzhou, China [CJ20140022]
  2. High-level Medicine Talents Training Project [2016CZBJ022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies of an association between physical activity and inflammatory bowel disease have yielded conflicting results. Aim: This meta-analysis was conducted to clarify whether there is an association between physical activity and inflammatory bowel disease. Methods: The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies published up to October 2015. Data were extracted and the summary relative risks (RRs) were calculated using a random effects or a fixed-effects model, according to heterogeneity. Results: Seven studies were included in the analysis. Relative to individuals with low physical activity, those who participated in high physical activity had an RR of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.50-0.79) for developing Crohn's disease. In stratified analyses, a significantly lower risk for Crohn's disease was associated with high physical activity in Europeans only (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.91); population-based control studies (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41-0.76); and case-control studies (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41-0.75). The data of 6 studies were pooled to analyze the effect of physical activity on the risk of ulcerative colitis, and no significant association was found (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-1.00). Conclusions: The pooled results of observational studies support that physical activity has a protective effect against Crohn's disease. (C) 2016 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available