4.5 Article

Updated and enhanced pig cardiac transcriptome based on long-read RNA sequencing and proteomics

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 23-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.10.005

Keywords

Nanopore; Proteomics; Transcriptome; Cardiac; Pig

Funding

  1. Klaus Tschira Stiftung gGmbH [00.219.2013]
  2. Deutsche Zentrum fur Herz-und Kreislaufforschung (DZHK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pigs are valuable models for cardiovascular research, but their genome and transcriptome annotation lack diversity. Researchers used high-throughput sequencing and proteomics to enhance pig cardiac transcriptome annotation, providing a valuable data resource.
Clinically translatable large animal models have become indispensable for cardiovascular research, clinically relevant proof of concept studies and for novel therapeutic interventions. In particular, the pig has emerged as an essential cardiovascular disease model, because its heart, circulatory system, and blood supply are anatomically and functionally similar to that of humans. Currently, molecular and omics-based studies in the pig are hampered by the incompleteness of the genome and the lack of diversity of the corresponding transcriptome annotation. Here, we employed Nanopore long-read sequencing and in-depth proteomics on top of Illumina RNA-seq to enhance the pig cardiac transcriptome annotation. We assembled 15,926 transcripts, stratified into coding and non-coding, and validated our results by complementary mass spectrometry. A manual review of several gene loci, which are associated with cardiac function, corroborated the utility of our enhanced annotation. All our data are available for download and are provided as tracks for integration in genome browsers. We deem this resource as highly valuable for molecular research in an increasingly relevant large animal model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available